|
|
|
|
|
Join
Kanban Development

Subscribe
|
|
|
|
Lean Flow &
Theory of Constraints
Join
Agile Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home 
Management 
Lean 
Kanban 
ShiftAltCtrl 
Agile+CMMI 
MSF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tuesday, Dec 08, 2009 |
 |
|
|
In February, March and April I'll be repeating my highly successful Kanban Coaching Workshop from London this October. These coaching workshops are designed for experienced agile, project management or process coaches and consultants who are looking to add Kanban skills to their toolbox of offerings. This intensive 3 day collaborative workshop is designed to enable participants to go out in the field and successful implement Kanban and Lean with their teams and client firms. Attendees will receive a recommendation from me that they can use with clients and will be listed on my (yet to be published) "trusted Kanban coach" web page.
You can't learn everything about Kanban in 3 days but those attended in London learned lots of ideas and gained the benefit of lots of experience that will enable them to make significant and valuable progress with clients.
Read what Rachel Davies had to say after attending the London workshop.
In February I'll be facilitating two workshops. The first in Cape Town, South Africa with Scrum Sense, Feb 5-7, and the other at the Conrad Hotel in Miami, Florida February 22-24.
In March, I'll be giving my only European coaching workshop in the first half of 2010 in Stockholm with Crisp. Check out crisp.se for details. Email me if interested in attending meanwhile. I also hope to announce a similar coaching workshop in Brazil, most likely Sao Paulo, March 8-10. Email if interested in attending.
In April, I'll be facilitating another north american workshop in Orange County, California, April 14-16. [venue to be announced soon]
Attendance at my own events in the United States is strictly limited to 8 participants to maximize the quality of the discussion and learning opportunity. So far we have 4 confirmed attendees in Miami, 4 others tentative but uncommitted. So there are 4 places open. Please book soon if want to attend this event. The Orange County workshop has some more possibilities with 3 confirmed attendees and 3 others currently tentative. Please email if you are interested but not ready to sign up immediately.
In addition to these 5 open workshops, I am also holding a closed private client workshop in Seattle in January 2010. If you'd like a closed Kanban coaching workshop at your firm, please get in touch via email. Technorati tag: David+Anderson, Agile+Management, Agile, Lean, Kanban, Project+Management, Software+Engineering, Process+Improvement, Change+Management
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Tuesday, Dec 08, 2009 |
 |
|
|
I'm teaching a few Kanban classes over the next two months in Europe and South
Africa.
[December]
The first of the 2 day classes in Stockholm with Crisp next week
[January]
Followed by a class in Krakow, Poland and another in Paris, France with Octo
[February]
I'm then heading down to South Africa from Paris in early February for a class with Scrum Sense in Cape Town.
[May]
Week of May 3rd class in Israel to be announced soon. Email for more details.
These 2 day events are aimed at Kanban beginners and team members from companies
trying to adopt Kanban or thinking about alternatives to existing agile or
traditional approaches to change and improvement. Technorati tag: David+Anderson, Agile+Management, Agile, Lean, Kanban, Project+Management, Software+Engineering, Process+Improvement, Change+Management
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Sunday, Nov 15, 2009 |
 |
|
|
The first Lean Software & Systems Conference will be held in Atlanta, Georgia, USA between April 21st and 23rd 2010.
Registration and the Call for Papers is now open at atlanta2010.leanssc.org
The first 50 registrants enjoy a super early discount rate of $800 plus entry to the exclusive speaker luncheon and a special limited edition Ltd WIP Society t-shirt, sponsored by David J. Anderson & Associates.
The Call for papers closes on December 14th.
Use the Twitter search tag #lssc10 to filter tweets about the event. Follow @lssc10 on Twitter for news from the organizing team.
If you are speaking or attending the conference you might like to tell people about it by adding these buttons to your web site design. If you want to use these assets on your site just paste the HTML code provided straight into your web source code or content management system.
Source: <a href="http://atlanta2010.leanssc.org/"><img alt="Atlanta 2010 Attendee" src="http://www.agilemanagement.net/lssc10/Atlanta2010Attendee.png" border="0" /></a>

Source: <a href="http://atlanta2010.leanssc.org/"><img alt="Atlanta 2010 Speaker" src="http://www.agilemanagement.net/lssc10/Atlanta2010Speaker.png" border="0" /></a>

Conference Chair: David J. Anderson
Track Chairs: Alan Shalloway, Joshua Kerievsky, James Sutton, Eric Willeke, Chris Shinkle, Richard Turner & David Anderson
Event Planner: Kelly Wilson
Organizing Sponsor: Software Engineering Professionals (SEP)
Event Team: Dennis Stevens, Janice Linden-Reed, Aaron Sanders, Eric Landes
Sponsorship opportunities email info@leanssc.org
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 |
 |
|
|
David Joyce has posted a quite remarkable blog summarizing the results at BBC Worldwide since they introduced the use of Kanban, to drive process improvements, one year ago.
Improved Predictability as well as Business Agility
Many people will review this post and look only at the data. As David himself summarizes, the average lead time fell by 8 days from 22 to 14. This does demonstrate improved business agility, a 33% drop in lead time is not to be sneazed at. However, the more careful viewer will observe the dramatic drop in the spread of variation. The upper control limit drops from 70+ to well under 40, almost a 50% drop in spread. What this means is that the team is much more predictable in delivery of new functionality. David is also verifiying that the newer data shows genuine special cause variations outside the limits. While he isn't stating categorically that the system is stable, in an SPC sense, as there may be some special cause variations hiding inside the limits, the performance shows a dramatic improvement in stability since Kanban was introduce. This is further evidence that the team is performing in a much more predictable fashion. It also implies that the team ought to be experiencing a much smoother working environment with far fewer events that randomize their schedule and distract their attention away from immediate customer-valued work.
Evidence of Little's Law Cause and Effect
The chart for development cycle time shows direct evidence that Little's Law is true and that the quantity of WIP has a direct causal relationship with cycle time. The mean drops from 9 days to 3 days but again the spread of variation drops even more dramtically from 31 days to 7 days. Again this is evidence that the team has much greater predictability. Reducing WIP not only reduces cycle time but it dramatically reduces variability too.
The Engineering cycle time chart simply reflects more of the same. Reducing WIP and the policies of Kanban and its expectation that blocking issues will be escalated and resolved quickly has a dramatic effect on both lead time and variability and shows significant measurable gains in both business agility and predictability as a result.
Improved Configuration Management Discipline and Reduced Deployment Transaction Costs
The Throughput chart doesn't tell us how much value is being delivered but it does show a dramatic increase in the number of releases to production. This rises from one every one or two weeks before Kanban to one almost every working day since Kanban was introduced. To make this possible there must have been an improvement in configuration management discipline and capability and an equal reduction in the transaction and coordination costs associated with a release. This is all indicative of an organization that is maturing and improving in capability as well as an organization that is considerably more "Lean" than it was a year ago, as waste associated with making a release has dramatically reduced.
Bugs decrease with less WIP and Improved Organizational Maturity
The final chart showing defects per week shows that quality did not suffer as a result of introducing Kanban and limiting WIP and that after some time for changes to kick-in that might be associated with an organization growing in maturity and capability the variability in the defect rate dropped dramatically with a small decrease in the mean number of bugs per week. Again this indicative of an organization that is much more predictable.
Conclusions
David is using the SPC charts as report cards. In Donald Wheeler's scale of adoption of SPC, this is the lowest level of maturity, and SPC as report cards doesn't fully qualify as quantitative management associated with level 4 in the CMMI model. However, we can conclude that this team exhibits significantly improved performance. They exhibit significantly lower variability and greater predictability and any use of SPC indicates a leadership that is determined to drive process improvement in a quantitative fashion. There is significant evidence of behaviors associated with CMMI model level 4 and this growth in maturity has been achieved in only 12 months.
This seems to be further evidence to back up my claims from my SEPG North America 2009 presentation that Kanban is proving to be a method that leads to accelerated organizational maturity and catalyst of organizational process improvement. We've now seen two teams at two significant companies in London adopt statistical process control and show significant progress towards higher maturity behaviors and performance. Perhaps it isn't a coincidence? Hopefully we'll see more like this emerge from the Kanban community over the next 12 months.
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 |
 |
|
|
I'm going to be touring Europe over the next 3 months giving a series of Kanban classes. These 2 day classes will give you the knowledge to understand what Kanban is all about, why it's important and how it might help your organization. You may be surprised to learn that it is a lot more than just puting a few story cards on a board. Kanban is about enabling evolutionary change with minimal resistance. It's about learning how to set and change policies that constrain performance and hold back organizational effectiveness. It's about learning how to empower people without loss of control - to make self-organization an organizational discipline and effective capability. It's about learning how to make objective decisions that optimize business outcomes.
You can read more about the class here.
Participants in the classes will learn how to use the simple process of limiting work-in-progress as a driver of change. Kanban is a change management method and a different approach to striking agreements between IT and the business. Kanban is about making promises you can keep and reaping the rewards of the trust divide that delivering on your promises enables. Kanban enables you to say "Yes" without compromising your core values of sustainable pace, craftsmanship, high quality, integrity, agility, and economic benefit.
To do this you'll learn how to define the policies that constrain the collaborative game of software development. You'll learn how to use those policies to manage risk and to reset negotiations and recast them as collaborative problem solving. "Yes, we can do that... Now how would you like to change things to accommodate this decision?"
Used effectively, Kanban will change you and your organization. If your workplace has been stagnating and you are looking for new ideas to unleash innovation, collaboration and creativity take 2 days of your precious time and come along. Find out what all the fuss is about!
I'll be in...
Stockholm September 24-25 (Crisp)
London October 1-2 (Skillsmatter)
Frankfurt October 5-6 (IT-Agile)
Brussels November 23-24 (ACA IT)
Utrecht November 26-27 (ACA IT)
There has also been suggestions of me coming to Denmark, Poland and France. If you'd like to me to run a Kanban class in your country, please get in touch.
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Wednesday, Aug 26, 2009 |
 |
|
|
I've made my slides for Agile 2009 available in the document archive of agilemanagement.net for everyone who attended or not to use. The great news is that Ryan Martens is interested in applying these ideas at Rally Development already.
I should also mention that my 3rd technique in these slides is similar to Todd Little's model which appeared in the recent book, Stand Back and Deliver! The model uses four classifications of projects that Todd calls Sheep Dogs, Colts, Bulls and Cows. The Cows are analogous to my Cash Cows, Bulls to Major Growth Market and Colts to Innovative/New. If there is a difference it's that my model is entirely market driven / external while Todd considers a complexity a dimension in the classification. These models are so similar that I will consider merging mine with Todd's with full attribution.
Chris Matts' believes that my first technique, previously published here in 2005 is similar to but less useful than Neil Nickolaisen's model also published in the recent book, Stand Back and Deliver! Neil's model maps projects at a portfolio level into 4 categories via a 2x2 matrix or dimensional assessment of market differentiation and alignment with corporate mission. He calls the segments: Don't Care; Partner; Differentiating; Parity. While this model is certainly compatible with my model they are not the same. Neil's model works at the project and portfolio level and assumes that the corporate mission is somehow correctly aligned with a strategic position and the market demands. My model works at the individual feature level and is again directly market facing insuring that the feature mix chosen for a project or iteration are aligned with the strategic positioning of the business and the allocation of types is aligned with the propensity for risk in the business plan or prospectus. Neil's model is certainly compatible with mine. If for example, a project initiative assessed as "Parity" but the product owner was picking a lot of "Differentiator" class features for the product mix then there is clearly a miss match. So I believe that Neil's model could be added as a fourth technique to the three presented here.
However, it's worth noting that these are tools that can be used as choices and are not necessarily all designed to be used together. My 3rd technique, like Todd's and Neil's are designed to allocate resources to control commitment to projects across a portfolio. To spread risk effectively. It may not make sense to use more than one of these techniques at any one company or division. Choose the one that resonates best with your organization. Technorati tag: David+Anderson, Agile+Management, Agile, Lean, Kanban, Software+Engineering, Project+Management, Risk+Management, Risk, Portfolio+Management, Program+Management
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Saturday, Aug 01, 2009 |
 |
|
|
The guys at Silverstripe in India have their own version of how to migrate from Scrum to Kanban.
Customer demand is finally driving the major tools vendors to respond and supply Kanban features in their product. Here David Laribee demonstrates on video, the shiny new Kanban features in the VersionOne product. This is very significant. It's the first tool that allows a company to manage Kanban initiatives within a portfolio that includes other Agile projects using methods like Scrum and XP. Apparently, customers are tell the folks at VersionOne that they want to use Kanban for product maintenance and upgrade releases with Scrum for new green-field projects. If this is true then, due to the fact that around 80% of all software development is maintenance and product upgrades, we should see significantly more adoption of Kanban over the next 10 years.
Stephan Schmidt has released a thin eBook that is available as a free download - 12 Things You can do do to shorten Lead Time and Time to Market in Software Development. It doesn't explicitly mention Kanban but does talk about visualizing and managing flow. Much of sentiment of the message is encapsulated in what we know as Kanban.
Stefan Rusek has announced a Kanban plug-in for FogBugz! Woohoo! FogBugz is a popular work tracking tool and now you Joel Spolsky fans can Kanban too. Yes you kan!
Mike Suarez is introducing Kanban at his workplace. He refers to it on his blog as the Coolban process. One of the rules is that no one is allowed to talk about Kanban ;-) I love this! Introduce process changes because you need them and they will help. No need to label them. I have to label Kanban so you can all follow it and learn it but no need to label it when introducing it on your team. Just do it!
Coolban Part 1 - Enter Kanban
Coolban Part 2 - Meet the Column
Coolban Part 3 - Welcome to Coolban!
And finally, Jim Benson is still advancing the Person Kanban meme...
Post 15: Visualizing the Flow - Polar State Based Personal Kanban with Habit Trackers
Post 14: Personal Kanban and Existential Overhead
Post 13: The MAN THAT WAS AWFUL approach to Personal Kanban
I suspect that this will become the topic for Jim's second book when he finishes his current manuscript on social media, Instant Karma! Technorati tag: David+Anderson, Agile+Management, Agile, Lean, Kanban, Software+Engineering, Project+Management
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Monday, Jul 27, 2009 |
 |
|
|
This week's roundup focuses mainly on Personal Kanban. There seems to be growing interest in this. I haven't tried it myself yet - at least not formally though I do use some of the techniques that others have been describing in terms of balancing the number and type of activities I work on. I've recently reduced the time I dedicate to blogging and my web site after two months of more intense effort. It's all about balancing a personal portfolio.
Personal Kanban
I had the pleasure of meeting Christina Skaskiw when I was in Stockholm recently. I'm delighted to see she is blogging now too. She's been experimenting with Personal Kanban and with Pomodoro too. Go add her blog to your rss reader!
Jon Miller gives us his 30 day update on his Personal Kanban journey. Quite a lot of changes and innovation. Show the Flow!
Jim Benson has been busy with his series on Personal Kanban...
12. Cadence and the Personal Kanban
11.Every Task is Sacred
10. The Task Based Personal Kanban Approach in Detail
9. The Sequestering Approach to Personal Kanban in Detail
8. The Subproject Approach to Personal Kanban in Detail
7. The Throughput Approach to Personal Kanban in Detail
Evolving Standups
Kevin Schlabach describes how his team was finding standup meetings tedious until they evolve to walk the board and focus on the work and not the effort individuals were expending.
Kanban for Design
Ryan Quintal shares his thoughts on using a Kanban approach for design activities on web sites and software. The picture in his post looks like it came from either my or Corey Ladas' personal collection and was taken at Corbis. Would be nice if Ryan could share some pics from his own experience to illustrate his words.
Nate Kohari on Zen and Kanban
This podcast with Nate Kohari of Agile Zen with Scott Hanselman is interesting more from the perspective that Hanselman attributes leadership in Kanban to Jim Shore, Arlo Belshee and Kenji Hiranabe. While Kenji is from Japan, it's this branch of the kanban systems evolution that Brian Marick has been calling Portland School Kanban. It's worth noting that none of these folks were at the Lean & Kanban 2009 and don't participate in the Kanbandev Yahoo! group or the Limited WIP Society. Their contribution is, however, valuable. All three of them are Agile Alliance Gordon Pask Award winners. And their work goes a long way to demonstrate how a kanban system can be used with early Agile methods like Extreme Programming. Something that meets with scepticism elsewhere.
What all of this shows is that we've still got some work to do to pull a diverse group of folks and independent but like-minded thinking together. Hopefully, Lean Software & Systems Conference 2010 in Atlanta will be an opportunity to do that. Meanwhile, Kenji will be speaking at the UK Lean Conference along with many of the regular Kanban community contributors. Technorati tag: David+Anderson, Agile+Management, Agile, Lean, Kanban, Software+Engineering, Project+Management
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
| |
|
 |